Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Vandalism in Progress)
Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!
- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
This page was last updated at 06:04 on 28 April 2025 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
![]() | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by HBC AIV helperbot14 (talk) when the backlog is cleared. |
Reports
[edit]- Kuripenjwen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 768 (AIV disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:38, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. — Newslinger talk 19:54, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- 185.135.216.85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 50 five times in the last 5 minutes (Shouting, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
Note: Globally blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2a01:c846:1985:ae00:98ff:72b5:e07d:fa40 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:01, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:57, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- Claire Denton (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:15, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. (It still needed to be reverted.) Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:35, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- 131.106.239.102 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:41, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:47, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 49.3.209.138 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Serious and repeated WP:BLP violations. Block evasion. Previous IPs:
- 123.243.66.199 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (blocked for one month)
- 203.166.239.117 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (blocked for 31 hours)
- 115.128.99.171 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (blocked for 3 months)
- 202.53.53.56 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- ...and several others... — Chrisahn (talk) 21:53, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. @Chrisahn: Please read the banner at the top of this page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:53, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think you looked at the user's edits. If you did, it would be obvious that this is a long-term vandal. I find your insinuation that I didn't read the banner silly and a bit insulting. I've reported lots of vandals at AIV and ANI. OK, I'll report this vandal at ANI, but I think you should be a bit more careful with how you deal with reports here. — Chrisahn (talk) 04:42, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Chrisahn: You reported 49.3.209.138 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) for BLP violations. And today's edit looks much more like a BLP violation than obvious vandalism. AIV is really intended for obvious vandalism and as mentioned on WP:GAIV:
complex cases should usually be referred to other boards
. Thanks for taking it to ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:13, 28 April 2025 (UTC)- A BLP violation that is also obvious vandalism. The categories aren't mutually exclusive. In the latest edit, the vandal claimed the person disappeared on December 11, 2025 (note: in the future). In a very similar previous edit, the vandal claimed the person died on December 11, 2024. Maybe I should have pointed out these details in my original report, but I wanted to keep it short, and I thought a quick look at the edits of the IPs would make it obvious that this is vandalism and block evasion. But anyway, my report here can be deleted. See ANI. — Chrisahn (talk) 05:27, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Chrisahn: You reported 49.3.209.138 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) for BLP violations. And today's edit looks much more like a BLP violation than obvious vandalism. AIV is really intended for obvious vandalism and as mentioned on WP:GAIV:
- I don't think you looked at the user's edits. If you did, it would be obvious that this is a long-term vandal. I find your insinuation that I didn't read the banner silly and a bit insulting. I've reported lots of vandals at AIV and ANI. OK, I'll report this vandal at ANI, but I think you should be a bit more careful with how you deal with reports here. — Chrisahn (talk) 04:42, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- 195.180.32.121 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning Captainllama (talk) 22:31, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:27, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- 213.120.116.40 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – longterm vandal. FMSky (talk) 22:33, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:27, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Erose9210 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Clearly WP:NOTHERE. See [1]. Skitash (talk) 00:04, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:09, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- TheOmgNoway6494 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – For disruptive editing, keep adding unsourced or poorly sourced content in articles. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:46, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:54, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- 118.70.127.49 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Related IP to above. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 03:05, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:45, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- SomeAnotherCastaway (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) User repeating the same behavior after many warnings (see talk page). Firstly the user make Vandalism edits to the page Sinners (2025 film) which was later revert with Vandalism warning. Then again make vandalism on Masters of the Universe (2026 film), later reverted with edit warning. Again the user engaged in the edit war of vandal text in the page Sinners (2025 film). Now the user making more vandalism edits to the page Heads of State (film). I have revert the edits now but i hope the user will come for the edit war here also as previously. Seeing to the Contributions the, edits seems unconservative or Vandalism. You should review the vandalism request on behalf of me as the user make bundle of vandalism edits after many warnings. Thank you - Misopatam (talk) 05:01, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. This looks like basically reasonable good-faith edits; please speak to the user about your concerns with their edits. Rusalkii (talk) 05:36, 28 April 2025 (UTC)